PROSPECTOR CATALOGING
REFERENCE COMMITTEE MEETING
- MINUTES: The minutes were approved as
they stand.
- ANNOUNCEMENTS:
- III STATISTICS: The October
2004 stats from III, run Oct. 2-3, included only a partial load of CRL
records. The January stats will include all the CRL records, putting
system totals at 6 million MARC records and above 18 million items.
- COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: CSM is now
fully up and running, launched at a party attended by the President and
Provost of Mines and a Vice-President from Endeavor. One known problem
with paging slips is being resolved. George has been contacted by
representatives from MOBIUS, ORBIS, and OhioLink seeking advice on
loading Endeavor libraries into their systems.
- UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: The target
date for Wyoming joining Prospector is June 2005; they will need to be on
Endeavor’s Unicode release first.
Carol White’s replacement to this Committee has not yet been
appointed.
- PROSPECTOR DIRECTORS MEETING: The meeting
will be held at Auraria on Nov. 19. On the agenda: “finances.” George and
Alan have contacted all the non-Alliance member libraries to discuss an
increase in system maintenance fees.
The proposal is to go to a flat fee, varying year by year. The
cost next year will just under $9500.00 for each Prospector library.
- PROSPECTIVE NEW MEMBERS: Preliminary
discussions have been held with several groups. Because of the variation
in size, the most likely candidates from the Marmot cluster would be
Grand Junction, Durango, Adams State, Western State, and Colorado
Mountain College. The University
of New Mexico is interested – FY06 at the earliest. Other possibilities:
Pikes Peak Library District (Sirsi), Douglas County Public Library
(Horizon), CSU-Pueblo (classic Dynix), Iliff (upgrading to Horizon). George
will be meeting with Sirsi representatives during ALA-Midwinter to go
over issues. He estimates a 2-year window to bring up sites from other
non-III systems.
- MILLENNIUM SILVER: George will
be loading Silver on December 14 (probably). It should take about ½
day.
- ELECTRONIC RESOURCES BEST PRACTICES: Wendy Baia
presented a separate draft to the Committee. After discussion, Cynthia assigned Florence, Wendy and Dawn
to work together on a “Conser neutral” draft to bring back to the
Committee in January.
- CRL RECORDS, TURN DOWN MESSAGE, ETC.: The Document
Delivery Committee had problems with our proposed “turn down” message
since there may be other reasons for turn downs besides CRL records. George is asking III for every message
supplied by the system and where they are applied. Perhaps the Committee’s concern can be
solved by a different message. It may be a good time to review all
out-of-the-box messages to check for accuracy and clarity, and look at the
possibility of customizing at the system level. Borrowing of CRL materials
should be activated sometime in December.
- TUTORIAL OF STAFF TELNET SITE: George
demonstrated the staff telnet version of Prospector for the Committee,
highlighting unique areas. The location field in the bib record shows which
library owns the master record. To access,
telnet: prospector.coalliance.org
username: prospect
password: taskforce
initials: tf
password: taskforce
- RECORD OVERLAY PROBLEM: Resolved by
Lois and Cindy.
- LOCATION AND SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MEETINGS: No meeting in
December. George will be mailing letters to all Library Directors shortly,
asking them to appoint a committee member for next year. For the time being, the Committee will
continue to meet at Jefferson County on the third Thursday of the month.
January 20, 2005 will be our next meeting.
- NETLIBRARY: David
Wagner is no longer with NetLibrary, and George is trying to find out who
is our new contact. Jim Williams chaired the meeting of NetLibrary
participants early in November.
For the next contract period, the group decided to maintain the
patron model but cut expenses by:
a.
Getting
NetLibrary to supply MARC records more expediently (June 2004 is the last group
loaded);
b.
Closing
out and removing all 2003 loads and identifying and re-loading only those
titles actually purchased;
c.
Lowering
the cap on item costs from $500 + 55% access fee to $250 total (i.e., $175 cost
of book + the 55% fee);
d.
Ordering
more expensive items as firm orders;
e.
Reviewing
the publisher list and cutting down numbers, especially those publishers that
allow free web access to their publications;
f.
Using
2004 and forward copyright dates.