Minutes
PROSPECTOR CATALOGING REFERENCE COMMITTEE
APRIL 20, 2000
The Prospector Catalog-Reference Committee met
at the Alliance on Thursday, April 20th.
Attendance: Joan
Beam, Helen Reed, George Machovec, Judith Heck, Bill Garrison, Vicki Nichols,
Lois Jones, Sandy Arnesen. Carol White
joined us via conference phone. Guest: Ann Rakes from Innovative Interfaces.
Prospector
Statistics
George Machovec distributed the April Prospector
statistics. They will also be in Datalink.
Denver
Public Library Load
III has re-populated the test database. An additional 10,000 records from CUB will
be loaded to test the matching algorithm and record overlay. The
Cataloging/Reference Committee will review the test database. Specific records
will be reviewed. In addition,
Committee members are encouraged to wander through the test database and look
for possible problems or errors, and report them to George Machovec. The main
load of Denver Public Library records will begin in early June. The Alliance
has hired a new programmer who is working on the patron authentication
specifications, followed by the issue of document requests. Endeavor libraries will be handling at a
later date.
Training
for DPL Staff
Members of the Catalog/Reference Committee(Garrison, Heck, Beam and Machovec)
will meet with a few members of the DPL staff to introduce them to, and train
them on Innopac and the Cataloging mode.
NOTE:
This is scheduled for May 23rd at the Alliance at 1:30 PM.
Upgrade
of Prospector to Release 2000
Prospector will be upgraded to Release 2000 on
Thursday, May 11th.
Prospector will be down for about 4 hours. George Machovec will do the upgrade locally in the morning. Lois Jones(DU) and Bill Garrison(CUB) will
test their record matches, and Vicki Nichols(Jefferson County Public Library)
will test how it works on a site running on Release 12.
Ann
Rakes. III
The INN-Reach unit at III is a combination of
the implementation and the help desk functions. Be sure to include
"INN-Reach" in any help desk query to get it to the right people. The
Unit is presently supporting 7 systems and 3 more are coming soon (Washington,
Maine, and Michigan).
Enhancements
for Release 2001 III
is looking at a brief list of enhancements for consideration in 2001:
·
update call numbers in the bibliographic and
item records whenever there is a change in the local system
·
work to make put-through faster.
·
Both the Call # and Identify fields are in
checkin records in Release 2000 already
·
tables showing holdings--trying to make more
uniform.
·
storing URLs and display in the institution
record. This may actually be in Release 2000 Revision B.
·
Featured Lists offers the pass through option.
·
Webpac will have enhanced staff possibilities.
The Circulation List will include many more
enhancements including Recalls and
regional preferences for fulfilling requests within a smaller geographical
area.
Encoding
levels in INN-Reach Ann
Rakes distributed a request from Sandy Westall at III dealing with the new
encoding levels of “3” and “4” and how
they should be handled in the Prospector INN-Reach tables. The group discussed recommended that they be
added to the Prospector table as follows:
Library Load Priority Encoding Levels
ENCODING ENCODING MEANING
GROUP LEVEL
10 (blank) Full Level
9 I Full Level input by an OCLC Library
8 1 Full Level, material no examined
7 L Non-LC & non-NLM loaded from
tape
6 K Less than full input by an OCLC
library
J Record deleted by LC from MARC file
2 Less than full level
M Less than full level, tape loaded
4 Core-level—less-than-full but
greater-than-minimal level
cataloging that meets
core record standards for completeness
5 8 CIP prepublication data
4 5 Partial level
7 Minimal level
3 Abbreviated level—brief record that
does not meet minimal level
cataloging specifications
3 E System-identified error in LC MARC
record
W Warning, possible error in LC MARC
record
2 U Unknown
Z Not applicable
Duplicates
on Prospector The
reason for some unexplained duplicates is the order in which the system loads
the item record and the bibliographic record into the INN-Reach software. If
the item record came first, a mini-bib was created automatically for it by
INN-Reach. If the bibliographic record had an OCLC number it was okay it was
properly overlaid. When the system has to make the match on the ISSN/ISBN and
title key, it fails. There is a fix
available for this problem. Ann will be
running the cleanup very soon to get all these records matched in
Prospector. She has found about 15,000
so far. The Catalog/Reference listserv will provide status reports as they are
done.
Advanced
Searching AVS, is in beta testing at OhioLink for the
INN-Reach systems. New INN-Reach sites get Advanced searching automatically.
Ann will check and see if Prospector gets it automatically or not.
Authority
Control The mix
in local systems makes this a difficult proposition. Could load authority records now, but who does the maintenance?
BCODE3
“g” BCODE3 “g” is
used by OhioLink for "electronic resource" and that is the label we will have to keep on
Prospector. The netLibrary records will
could appear this way. CUB has the
netLibrary records, ready to upload to Prospector. The BCODE3 “g” will mask all
item records (weren't given any at CUB) for the netLibrary records, i.e. those
from Colorado College. George will run lists of any BCODE3 “g” instances which
local libraries need to clean up and distribute them via the cataloging liaison
listserv.
Enhancements
The Committee ranked the list of INN-Reach
Catalog enhancements which was compiled and distributed via the INN-Reach
listserv by Nancy Nathanson at Orbis (the Circulation Committee reviewed
Circulation enhancements earlier).
Helen Reed, as Chair of the Catalog/Reference Committee will bring our
rankings to the meeting at IUG on
Monday May 1st.
These are the Prospector Committee
Rankings(These do not necessarily correspond with the Orbis or OhioLink
rankings.) NOTE: The list of INN-Reach enhancements is
available at:
http://libweb.uoregon.edu/orbis/staffhome/enhance_req,2000may.htm
·
Cat 1: Very Important
·
Cat 2: Important
·
Cat 3: Critical
·
Cat.4: Very Important
·
Cat.5: Very Important
·
Cat.6: Critical (similar to Cat.3: URLs in
INN-Reach)
·
Cat 7: we abstained
·
Cat.8: Important (also suggest creating a new
BCode3 value in addition to g.)
·
Cat.9: in Release 2000
·
Cat.10: in Release 2000
·
Cat.11: Best handled by local practice
·
Cat.12: we abstained
·
Cat.13: Critical and III plans for Release 2001.
Submitted by Joan Beam with contributions by
Helen Reed and George Machovec